llm models
for Founders & engineers
GPT-4o vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet: which is better for Founders & engineers?
TL;DR for Founders & engineers
GPT‑4o is the most versatile multi‑modal model, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers long‑context performance and strong safety.
Key Differences
| Feature | GPT-4o | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Multimodality (audio/image/video) | GPT-4o approach | Claude 3.5 Sonnet approach |
| Context length (200k vs shorter) | GPT-4o approach | Claude 3.5 Sonnet approach |
| Response speed & cost | GPT-4o approach | Claude 3.5 Sonnet approach |
| Safety & guardrails | GPT-4o approach | Claude 3.5 Sonnet approach |
| Interactive Artifacts | GPT-4o approach | Claude 3.5 Sonnet approach |
| Ecosystem integration | GPT-4o approach | Claude 3.5 Sonnet approach |
Pricing Snapshot
GPT‑4o: $2.50/M input & $10/M output; Claude 3.5: $3/M input & $15/M output (2025‑10‑13)
Last reviewed: 2025-10-13
GPT-4o
Choose GPT-4o if:
- You need audio/vision & fast responses
- You prefer broad ecosystem & tool integration
- You work across multiple languages
Pros
- + Multi-modal (text/audio/image/video)
- + Strong reasoning & coding
- + Fast responses
- + Improved multilingual performance
- + Cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo
Cons
- - Closed-source weights
- - Usage-based costs
- - Rate limits & policies
- - Requires internet connectivity
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if:
- You need 200k-token context
- You prioritize writing quality & safety
- You want the Artifacts workspace
Pros
- + 200k-token context
- + Fast & articulate responses
- + Strong vision & reasoning
- + Interactive Artifacts panel
- + Safety-forward design
Cons
- - Closed weights
- - Regional availability
- - Higher output cost
- - Limited free usage
Also Consider
More Comparisons
Get notified when we publish new tool comparisons
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.