Best AI IDEs
Compare the top ai ides tools. Find the right one for your project.
Notable Features
VS Code–based AI IDE Natural language search across repo Multi-file context windows Agent & chat modes
Strengths
- + Deep codebase understanding (@files/@folders)
- + Ask/Agent/Manual AI modes
- + Supports multiple LLMs (GPT, Claude, Gemini)
- + Inline edits & refactors
- + Great for repo-scale changes
Considerations
- - Paid plans start at $20/mo
- - Limited free completions
- - No cross-IDE support
- - Newer product; smaller community
Notable Features
Inline code suggestions Chat & voice commands GitHub integration Multi-language support
Strengths
- + Wide IDE support
- + Good autocomplete & chat
- + Low cost & free for students
- + Integrated with GitHub
- + Large user base
Considerations
- - Limited repo-wide context
- - Variable code quality
- - Data privacy concerns
- - Requires GitHub account
Notable Features
Project-level planning Cross-IDE plugins Team collaboration & SOC2 Semantic code search
Strengths
- + Designed for large & nested codebases
- + Multi-file planning & search
- + Cross-IDE integration
- + Team collaboration features
- + Affordable pricing
Considerations
- - New product with smaller community
- - Setup & onboarding overhead
- - Latency on very large projects
- - Fewer inline edit features
Popular Comparisons
cursor vs github copilot
Cursor gives deep repository context and AI-powered refactors via its own IDE, whereas GitHub Copilot offers lightweight AI coding assistance across many IDEs.
Read comparison
windsurf vs cursor
Windsurf focuses on planning and navigating large codebases across IDEs, while Cursor excels at surgical, in-editor edits within its own IDE.
Read comparison
Stay Updated
Get notified about new ai ides comparisons and insights
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.