image gen
for Local SD users
ComfyUI vs Automatic1111 (A1111): which is better for Local SD users?
TL;DR for Local SD users
ComfyUI offers node-graph control for custom pipelines and LoRA training; Automatic1111 is the go-to for ease of use and extension support.
Key Differences
| Feature | ComfyUI | Automatic1111 (A1111) |
|---|---|---|
| Node graph vs simple UI | ComfyUI approach | Automatic1111 (A1111) approach |
| Learning curve & flexibility | ComfyUI approach | Automatic1111 (A1111) approach |
| Extension ecosystem | ComfyUI approach | Automatic1111 (A1111) approach |
| Speed & efficiency | ComfyUI approach | Automatic1111 (A1111) approach |
| LoRA training support | ComfyUI approach | Automatic1111 (A1111) approach |
| Beginner friendliness | ComfyUI approach | Automatic1111 (A1111) approach |
Pricing Snapshot
Both free open-source projects; require local GPU (2025-10-13)
Last reviewed: 2025-10-13
ComfyUI
Choose ComfyUI if:
- You want granular control & custom workflows
- You need to train LoRAs & complex pipelines
- You're comfortable with a learning curve
Pros
- + Flexible node‑graph workflows
- + Supports custom nodes & LoRA training
- + Memory‑efficient & fast
- + Open‑source & active community
Cons
- - Steep learning curve
- - Less beginner‑friendly
- - Requires local GPU
- - Setup can be complex
Automatic1111 (A1111)
Choose Automatic1111 (A1111) if:
- You want an easy web UI out of the box
- You need many ready-made extensions
- You prioritize quick start & community support
Pros
- + Beginner-friendly UI
- + Huge extension ecosystem
- + Easy installation
- + Built-in inpainting & outpainting
- + Widely used
Cons
- - Fewer advanced features
- - UI feels dated
- - Reliability issues & slower performance
- - Requires manual setup on some systems
Also Consider
More Comparisons
Get notified when we publish new tool comparisons
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.